Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; _WikiDiffEngine has a deprecated constructor in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 40
Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; WikiDiff has a deprecated constructor in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 441
Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; WikiDiffFormatter has a deprecated constructor in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 763
Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; WikiUnifiedDiffFormatter has a deprecated constructor in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 931
Deprecated: assert(): Calling assert() with a string argument is deprecated in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 335
Deprecated: assert(): Calling assert() with a string argument is deprecated in /srv/website/_bw4/util/includes/diff.php on line 335
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /srv/website/_bw4/liberty/content_history_inc.php:58) in /srv/website/_bw4/kernel/BitSystem.php on line 419
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /srv/website/_bw4/liberty/content_history_inc.php:58) in /srv/website/_bw4/themes/BitThemes.php on line 2109 - History of Time
This started as an email, but I realsied that I needed to expand on various point as I go, so this is the base version and I can add detail pages on various points.
+
This started as an email, but I realsied that I needed to expand on various point as I go, so this is the base version and I can add detail pages on various points. ((Ideal timestamp data)) identifies my ideal timestamp.
Many of the current standards do not always take real world situations into account, or even define basic limitations they have assumed. Blindly following one standard, such as the SQL ones misses the fact often that these were written before other standards that provide the essential data. Also at that time computers only talked in English so there was no need to worry about other alphabets. Today native English speakers and Christians are a minority and the majority expect their computers to work with their standards and at the very least allow them to enter data in their local language. So UTC8 tends to be a basic requirement of any data system and all the problems that introduces, yet the SQL standards are still essentially 'English' as is the case with most programming languages and international standards like the RFC system. PHP has even given up using anything but ASCII for code, although UTF8 variable names work most of the time if not documented and is another can of worms. We supposedly have a soultion to international names, but does it work everywhere?